I haven’t read the regs on poaching as it’s not on my “to do” list, but are they still not able to seize your vehicles etc that were used in the poaching act? Having even a ”cheap” truck seized these days is $5k minimum to replace, assuming it’s reliable enough to get you out to the animals. A 10 year old 4x4 is worth $15-20k these days (aside from domestic 1/2 tons), so that is a big hit for most people.
I don’t want to turn this into yet another politics thread, but there are a LOT of issues that could be solved with penalties that would deter criminals. Gun “control” would not even be (much of) a conversation if it were a 20 year mandatory sentence for using a firearm in commission of a crime.
If we’re not supposed to eat animals, how come they’re made out of meat?
BHA, BCWF, CCFR, PETA, Lever Action Addict.
These are the fines for the tickets that COs can had out and not the maximum fine under the Wildlife Act that can be imposed by a Judge. Those still can range in the multiple thousands of dollars if the court decides it’s a serious enough offence. Officers have to decide on which is appropriate for the situation at hand. A ticket or court appearance. Crown Counsel has the final decision on what goes to court. COs can’t seize your vehicle for other than evidentiary purposes to prove a violation. They can submit a request that it be included in the penalty assessed by the Courts n serious cases. The Judge can order it forfeited to the Crown if deemed appropriate. A Judge will rarely fine someone an amount in excess of their ability to pay the fine in a reasonable amount of time. Both Crown Counsel and Defence make submissions on this.
Thanks for the clarification Steve.
If we’re not supposed to eat animals, how come they’re made out of meat?
BHA, BCWF, CCFR, PETA, Lever Action Addict.
Just throwing this out there.... YMMV
Institutional racism, also known as systemic racism, is defined as policies and practices that exist throughout a whole society or organization that result in and support a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others based on race or ethnic group.
A more effective policy would be to eliminate off season hunting based on race.