BCrams
09-05-2008, 11:26 AM
OK folks ..... in my haste yesterday to put up the pictures while multi tasking a million things at work of the ram Rand took .....
....a small error on my part to correct and consequently .... the age of the ram.
The previous images put up by 'wild images' in which I posted (highlighting both methods into one photo is correct)......including other sheep ...
I just slipped up on this one......
All the rings identified are "correct" and this does not change.
Below in first picture -- you see the 8.5......... the .5 signifies the end of that summers growth ..... hence cross the 2mm of growth ring to spring to 9 yrs and the remainder is the half ..... the correct ram age below is indeed 9.5 as willy and others have guessed (unless you're counting false annuli).
To put it into another perspective and "much easier for aging" is to look at the tip where the 1/2 year marker is. That only goes up to the "beginning or start" of the annuli. Go to the "end" of the annuli and it is now 1 yrs old.
Using that method to start Year 1 at the first nub will produce the answer of 9.5 (see second photo with both numbers up to reflect this). With my method you need to always account for the last ring and I didn't on this ram.
I simply forgot to account for the final ring when I did the numbers up and threw them in.
A mistake on my part! :redface:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v443/BCrams/69062.jpg
Second photo:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v443/BCrams/69062a.jpg
....a small error on my part to correct and consequently .... the age of the ram.
The previous images put up by 'wild images' in which I posted (highlighting both methods into one photo is correct)......including other sheep ...
I just slipped up on this one......
All the rings identified are "correct" and this does not change.
Below in first picture -- you see the 8.5......... the .5 signifies the end of that summers growth ..... hence cross the 2mm of growth ring to spring to 9 yrs and the remainder is the half ..... the correct ram age below is indeed 9.5 as willy and others have guessed (unless you're counting false annuli).
To put it into another perspective and "much easier for aging" is to look at the tip where the 1/2 year marker is. That only goes up to the "beginning or start" of the annuli. Go to the "end" of the annuli and it is now 1 yrs old.
Using that method to start Year 1 at the first nub will produce the answer of 9.5 (see second photo with both numbers up to reflect this). With my method you need to always account for the last ring and I didn't on this ram.
I simply forgot to account for the final ring when I did the numbers up and threw them in.
A mistake on my part! :redface:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v443/BCrams/69062.jpg
Second photo:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v443/BCrams/69062a.jpg